Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Duke of Montrose (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 9 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].


Commons Bill [HL]

I am interested to hear what the Minister has to say on this subject. He has raised some interesting questions. We are still not entirely clear on what liabilities commons associations might generate during their lifetime. Of course there could certainly be agri-environmental undertakings—I do not consider them to be liabilities—and I am not sure what would happen to such undertakings when the person undertaking them disappears. Obviously, if the liabilities and undertakings were to become too draconian, it is very unlikely that anyone would choose to set up a new commons association to take the place of the old one. This goes back to our earlier questions on whether some constraint should be placed on the way that debts are structured if they are engendered by a commons association. In the light of the Minister’s remarks, we would like to take the amendment away and see whether we can bring it back in a revised form. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 35 agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c239-40GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Agriculture Common land Fees and charges Functions Land use Grazing land Ownership Powers Membership Payments Management Nature conservation Registration Commons councils Village greens
Legislation
Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk