Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kimball (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Friday, 18 November 2005. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Supply of Relevant Veterinary Medicinal Products Order 2005.


Supply of Relevant Veterinary Medicinal Products Order 2005

My Lords, I can add very little to what has been said by my noble friend Lord Soulsby. We have a difficult situation in treating animals. I am thinking particularly of horses. The charge a veterinary surgeon can make will often depend on the fact that some of the charge can be recovered in the prescription he writes. We do not want to reduce the number of calls a veterinary surgeon may make. He may be treating an animal, but the animal does respond to that treatment because he has got it wrong. He will need to change the treatment. I was extremely interested in the ““Country File”” programme of 7 November, which explained how we can go to Ireland and buy prescriptions at a much reduced cost. If you have a horse that is on Butazolidin, you do not have to go back to your own veterinary surgeon for another prescription. You can go to Ireland, fill your pockets with the drug, and come back and continue the treatment. As with so much in the profession, this is an extremely complicated business. We must proceed with great care. I would like to see the order withdrawn at this stage in order to allow us to consider it further, particularly in view of the costs involved.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c1365-6 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Animal welfare Consumers Costs Competition Fees and charges Drugs Income Prices Prescriptions Veterinary services Veterinary medicine
Legislation
Supply of Relevant Veterinary Medicinal Products Order 2005
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk