Proceeding contribution from Lord Rowlands (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 26 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL].
Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL]
I suggest to my noble friend that, because this is important and because it concerns complaints about the commissioner himself or herself, he or she should not be the final arbiter of the procedure. In this provision, the Assembly can make suggestions and propose amendments to the commissioner’s draft, but it does not have the power to insist. What would happen if the Assembly were dissatisfied with aspects of the commissioner’s proposals but the commissioner nevertheless still went ahead with them? I think that in this case the Assembly should have the power to approve, rather than just be consulted.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 674 c370GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Disclosure of information Abuse Accountability Annual reports Equality Domestic abuse Functions Powers of entry Older people Monitoring Wales Commissioner for Older People in Wales
- Legislation
- Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:04:40 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279100
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279100
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279100