Proceeding contribution from Earl Peel (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 1 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
Commons Bill [HL]
Would I be right in saying that, if the owner of the land in question had given rights to people to conduct such activities in written form on a legal basis over 20 years, that would not necessarily result in the achievement of a prescriptive right? In other words, at certain points throughout the 20-year period, written permission has been given by the landowner, so that, at the end of the period, there would not be a prescriptive right. I have not explained it very well, but I think that the noble Lord knows what I am saying.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c9GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Applications Common land Land Inspections Donors Documents Land use Ownership Planning Management National Trust Registration Sports HM Land Registry Commons councils Village greens
- Legislation
- Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:23:36 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280251
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280251
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280251