Proceeding contribution from Duke of Montrose (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 1 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
Commons Bill [HL]
moved Amendment No. 75:"Page 9, line 4, leave out ““previously”” and insert ““immediately before the relevant date””" The noble Duke said: I am concerned that the word ““previously”” is non-specific. Would the Government support the registration of rights of common that had been extinguished by common law through alteration to the dominant tenement or even the reinstatement of rights which had not been in use for a number of years? If the Government cannot accept the amendment because they propose to allow reinstatement, we believe their intention should be expressed on the face of the Bill by some form of words qualifying or replacing the word ““previously””. I beg to move.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c34GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Applications Common land Land Inspections Donors Documents Land use Ownership Planning Management National Trust Registration Sports HM Land Registry Commons councils Village greens
- Legislation
- Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:44:03 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280310
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280310
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280310