Proceeding contribution from Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 16 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Consumer Credit Bill.
Consumer Credit Bill
I support the remarks of the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley. My concern is very straightforward. This is clearly a highly desirable clause giving powers to provide intermediate action. My concern is that it will be a lawyers’ paradise. The human rights committee is indicating it believes that there is a serious human rights concern here, but Ministers in another place are saying that they do not believe that is so. The way in which such disputes are usually recognised and regulated is through the courts. I should think it would be to the Government’s benefit to bring forward a clause that we all support by accepting this amendment or introducing their own to make it clear beyond peradventure that there is not a human rights risk.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c310GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Consumers Debts Credit agreements Credit Credit cards Licensing Instalment credit Powers Office of Fair Trading Regulation
- Legislation
- Consumer Credit Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:42:41 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280404
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280404
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280404