Proceeding contribution from Lord De Mauley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 16 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Consumer Credit Bill.
Consumer Credit Bill
I hope I gave the impression that we recognise the advantages of the intermediate sanctions, which are, of course, an improvement over a single sanction of removal of a licence. I also hope that I have explained our concerns about the use of the word dissatisfied, in particular. While we are happy to withdraw the amendment in Grand Committee, we reserve our right to come back at Report. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 38 agreed to. Clauses 39 to 42 agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c312-3GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Consumers Debts Credit agreements Credit Credit cards Licensing Instalment credit Powers Office of Fair Trading Regulation
- Legislation
- Consumer Credit Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:42:42 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280409
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280409
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280409