Proceeding contribution from Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 16 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Consumer Credit Bill.
Consumer Credit Bill
I support the noble Lord with the amendment. We seem to have failed on intellectual argument in our amendments so far, so I shall try flattery on this occasion in the hope that the Minister will accept the amendment. I hope that the Minister is listening out of his left ear if flattery is going to work. Certainly under his regime, the DTI has an extremely good record of consulting stakeholders in relation to all matters under its jurisdiction, but I have yet to be persuaded that the Office of Fair Trading has the same good record. I am persuaded by the argument of the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, on the basis that the DTI will do a much better consultation job with its stakeholders than the Office of Fair Trading.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c314GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Consumers Debts Credit agreements Credit Credit cards Licensing Instalment credit Powers Office of Fair Trading Regulation
- Legislation
- Consumer Credit Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:27:45 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280412
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280412
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280412