Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 October 2005. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Children and Adoption Bill [HL].


Children and Adoption Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. 84:"Page 7, line 13, leave out ““18”” and insert ““16””" The noble Earl said: This is a simple amendment that raises a question about rights and responsibilities. It was the Prime Minister himself whom I heard on radio the other day—on 16 September, in fact—saying, and I hope that I quote him accurately:"““people have always accepted that with rights come responsibilities . . . human liberties have always been qualified by some sense of duty or responsibility””." I fully agree. One must reflect that if the legal age for sexual activity and service for the Armed Forces is 16 years-old, surely the potential responsibilities—the Government have suggested enforcement orders against a person who fails to comply with the contact order—should also be set at 16, rather than the 18 years that the Bill proposes. I simply ask the Minister to explain the thinking behind that choice of age limit and whether he has any centre of agreement with the arguments that I have advanced. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c134-5GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Compensation Adoption CAFCASS Contact orders Fees and charges Enforcement Domestic abuse Intercountry adoption Abduction Family proceedings Pilot schemes Protection Wales Unpaid work
Legislation
Children and Adoption Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk