Proceeding contribution from Julian Brazier (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 12 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Armed Forces Bill.
Armed Forces Bill
There is an important distinction here. Of course I have no problem with the court; I thought that I had made that clear. My objection is to its introduction into British law. The hon. Gentleman must ask himself whether there is the remotest chance either that Colonel Mendonca would have been charged or that General Peter Wall would be being investigated if it had not been for the enactment of that piece of legislation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c1183
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Disciplinary proceedings Criminal investigation Discipline Appeals Crime Courts Administration of justice Armed forces Armed conflict Courts martial Civilians Inquiries Jurisdiction Homicide Dismissal Powers Prosecutions Military police Officers Military law Standards Low flying Sentencing Trials Service Civilian Court
- Legislation
- Armed Forces Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-07-22 08:48:49 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285615
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285615
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285615