Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 December 2005. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Animal Health Act 1981 (Amendment) Regulations 2005.
Animal Health Act 1981 (Amendment) Regulations 2005
My Lords, the answer is the former of those two. It can be minimised in the way that the noble Duke would prefer. I hope that I have answered the queries that have arisen out of the debate. On Question, Motion agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c1046
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Animal welfare Animals EU law Disease control Foot and mouth disease Livestock Slaughterhouses
- Legislation
- Animal Health Act 1981 (Amendment) Regulations 2005
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:36:15 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285684
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285684
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285684