Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill.


Identity Cards Bill

No, I am sorry if I did not make myself clear. I intended to speak to Amendment No. 211A, which would restrict Clause 17(2) of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 to paragraphs (a), (b) and (c), but not (d). To leave in paragraph (d) would open the doors of disclosure too wide, because paragraph (d) is about the most universal entrée that you could imagine. It says that you can have disclosure for,"““the purpose of facilitating a determination of whether any such investigation or proceedings should be initiated””." That is way beyond the pale, and I hope that the Government are not interested in that pre-consideration as an excuse for getting into the confidential information.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1337 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Biometrics Crime prevention Costs British nationality Fraud Fees and charges Identity cards Information Proof of identity Passports Registration Research Revenue and Customs
Legislation
Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk