Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Scientific Publications: Free for all?.


Scientific Publications: Free for all?

: I am very grateful to the hon. Gentleman for accepting the point that the publishing of scientific research will always cost money. That is an essential part of this debate. As for his earlier intervention, I believe that the author pays model severely undermines the prospect of peer review. How can the advocates of change guarantee that we will not rapidly move to a model of ““who pays most gets published fastest””? If there is a free-for-all, how can we monitor the quality of contributions as we do now, both by peer review and by the quality of journals in which they are published? The new model will not simply reduce the costs of disseminating scientific research to the benefit of the research community; it will transfer those costs somewhere else within the scientific community.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c520WH 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Access Competition Developing countries Archives Libraries Prices Publishing Magazine press Teachers Research Science
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk