Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Charles Hendry (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 December 2005. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Scientific Publications: Free for all?.


Scientific Publications: Free for all?

The hon. Member for Harrogate and Knaresborough (Mr. Willis) said in his opening remarks that he had not expected to become an expert on scientific publishing. One of the great aspects of this place is that it is a voyage of discovery in which many things come before us in which we do not expect to become experts, and we end up realising how fascinating they are and how much subject matter there is to be considered. I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on the very thorough and measured way in which he introduced the debate, and the very clear way in which he set out the findings of the Select Committee's report. If anyone can make a dry subject interesting, it is the hon. Member for Norwich, North (Dr. Gibson), who has the ability to bring a great sense of fun, enthusiasm and excitement to everything that he does. That will have been evident in the work of the Committee in this area and more broadly. It is notable that when he received a politics charity award for his contribution to health last week or the week before, of all the people who received awards, his was the one that brought pleasure to all parties because of the genuine respect for the expertise and excellence that he brings to his subject. Throughout the debate, we have heard thoughtful and well-prepared speeches that presumably were written with the intention of publishing them at some time in some learned journal for future generations to read. Whether we will be prepared to pay to have them published is another subject for debate. We have all learned a great deal more. A week ago, as I was languishing in my sick bed with scarlet fever, the thought of speaking today on scientific publications was not an immediate aid to recovery, and at times a relapse seemed almost attractive. The more that I have looked into the subject, however, the more truly fascinating I have found it to be, and it is worthy of the debate this afternoon. We have also been taken by the fascinating undercurrent of biology v. chemistry, on which there is clearly an even greater rift between old Labour and new Labour.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c535-6WH 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Access Competition Developing countries Archives Libraries Prices Publishing Magazine press Teachers Research Science
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk