Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].


Compensation Bill [HL]

I have a great deal of sympathy with the principle behind the amendment moved by the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Wirral. However, I think that its drafting has gone astray somewhere, because what identifies something that ought to be under the control of the legislation is not the residence of the client but the location where the claim would be litigated. The amendment would exclude some people who ought to be protected—for instance, a foreigner who, on a holiday visit to England, suffers injury as a result of the alleged negligence of an English local authority. On the other hand, it would cover those who probably ought not to be covered, such as someone who is resident in England but pursues a claim which, if it has to be litigated, would be litigated in a different country. However, I see the point and I hope that the noble Baroness will be able to assure us that the Bill can be used against those who are resident in Fuengirola or South Africa and are trying to make money out of claims based in this country.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c151GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Contracts Compensation Codes of practice Consumers Courts Companies Advertising Accidents Advisory services Cross border cooperation Housing Fees and charges EU law Financial services Legal representation Personal injury Protection Negligence Rehabilitation Standards Regulation Tenants Telephone services Unsolicited goods and services Claims management services
Legislation
Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk