Proceeding contribution from Viscount Eccles (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].
Compensation Bill [HL]
Before we leave this amendment, I keep reading the words from the 7th report of the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee. They are pretty stern. The committee states:"““In our opinion it is inappropriate that so many key features are here proposed to be left to delegated legislation””." Unless we have a clearer view of the framework and what will be in the delegated legislation—if it remains delegated and does not come into the Bill—either in Committee or at Report, we have quite a problem.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c167GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Contracts Compensation Codes of practice Consumers Courts Companies Advertising Accidents Advisory services Cross border cooperation Housing Fees and charges EU law Financial services Legal representation Personal injury Protection Negligence Rehabilitation Standards Regulation Tenants Telephone services Unsolicited goods and services Claims management services
- Legislation
- Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:21:06 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291280
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291280
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291280