Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].


Compensation Bill [HL]

If I may quote from the comments made earlier by the noble Baroness, we will hear about this before we reach the Report stage, and I very much welcome that. However, perhaps I may take issue for a moment with her on the conflict with Amendment No. 51. I do not necessarily agree that if Amendment No. 51 is agreed to, we cannot agree to Amendment No. 36 as well. My explanation is that Amendment No. 51 fills in a gap, while action under Amendment No. 36 is awaited. Amendment No. 36 should require the Lord Chancellor to act, but it does not specify a time when the Lord Chancellor is required to designate a regulator, simply that at some point he must do so. However, the Chairman of Committees has already referred to my speech as a winding up contribution. I had better do so. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c180-1GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Contracts Compensation Codes of practice Consumers Courts Companies Advertising Accidents Advisory services Cross border cooperation Housing Fees and charges EU law Financial services Legal representation Personal injury Protection Negligence Rehabilitation Standards Regulation Tenants Telephone services Unsolicited goods and services Claims management services
Legislation
Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk