Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].


Compensation Bill [HL]

I am grateful to the noble Viscount. I understand that there is an arm’s length relationship between the FSA and the Treasury, but there is a relationship. If the FSA were designated in this way, we would look at the Bill to ensure that it fitted with what needs to happen. In our design of the Bill, we believe that most of the cases we have in mind would be covered without having to amend it. But of course if amendment were needed we would make it. I think that addresses the noble Viscount’s point.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c184GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Contracts Compensation Codes of practice Consumers Courts Companies Advertising Accidents Advisory services Cross border cooperation Housing Fees and charges EU law Financial services Legal representation Personal injury Protection Negligence Rehabilitation Standards Regulation Tenants Telephone services Unsolicited goods and services Claims management services
Legislation
Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk