Proceeding contribution from Viscount Eccles (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].
Compensation Bill [HL]
It might be a good opportunity to ask two questions about claims management services and the professional people to carry them out. First, ““claims management services”” presumably means the exercise of the management of resisting claims as well as of making them. If that were not true, we could have firms that set up in the resisting of claims and went on to arrangements as to how they would be remunerated. Secondly, presumably when we come to authorisation it will not only be those people who are intending to go to law that we shall be considering, but those people who settle out of court. That means, I assume, that every single insurance company will have to be authorised, or be excused from being authorised, because they all manage claims.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c186GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Contracts Compensation Codes of practice Consumers Courts Companies Advertising Accidents Advisory services Cross border cooperation Housing Fees and charges EU law Financial services Legal representation Personal injury Protection Negligence Rehabilitation Standards Regulation Tenants Telephone services Unsolicited goods and services Claims management services
- Legislation
- Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:21:39 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291322
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291322
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291322