Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].


Compensation Bill [HL]

The noble Viscount raised an interesting point. I can envisage that there could be some cases in which claims management services could be involved in the resistance of claims, particularly on matters of dispute between two people, neither of whom is wealthy or is conducting a business; disputes over boundaries between houses, for example, which tend to raise a great deal of bitterness and cost a great deal of money. It would be desirable to make it clear that there could be advice or other services in relation to the making of a claim or in relation to the resisting of a claim; that is a fair point, although it would obviously be much less likely. Whether insurance companies will have to be authorised under the legislation, I am more doubtful. However, this is not the time to go into that. No doubt the Minister and her team will consider whether it is a possibility. I am grateful to the Minister for having welcomed the principle behind this short amendment and I beg leave to withdraw it. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c186-7GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Contracts Compensation Codes of practice Consumers Courts Companies Advertising Accidents Advisory services Cross border cooperation Housing Fees and charges EU law Financial services Legal representation Personal injury Protection Negligence Rehabilitation Standards Regulation Tenants Telephone services Unsolicited goods and services Claims management services
Legislation
Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk