Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 19 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill.


Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill

I am not sure that I quite understand what the noble Lord, Lord Hylton, is getting at with that question. In all cases of deprivation of British citizenship, we would not create a situation where somebody was stateless. Therefore, Clause 53 is relevant to those who are dual nationals. Clause 54 refers to those who have right of abode. The noble Baroness, Lady Carnegy, said that if we removed their right of abode, they would be stateless. They would not be stateless, because the reason that they have right of abode is that they have citizenship elsewhere. As the noble Lord, Lord Dholakia, said, they are given right of abode by nature of their status.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c275GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Asylum Detainees Deportation British nationality Eligibility Immigration controls Immigration Undocumented migrants Human trafficking Exemptions Prosecutions Paternity Refugees Safety Trials Victims Dual nationality
Legislation
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk