Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 24 January 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.


Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill

The noble Viscount makes an important point, which I suspect we will be discussing in some detail when we come to Amendment No. 122 on the role of Natural England in making decisions. Sometimes there will difficult decisions between various aspects of sustainable development. There is a view that Natural England should choose the environmental side in all circumstances, and an opposing view—which the Government take—that an independent body like Natural England must be able to choose between the conflicting, if they are conflicting, possibilities. That is what it is there for. We do not expect that those conflicting possibilities will arise every time, or even very often. The hub of the debate about what is called the Sanford principle is the question that the noble Viscount has asked.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c1120-1 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Climate change Departmental responsibilities Finance Environment protection Functions Local government Pay Membership Public appointments Pensions Staff Non-departmental public bodies English Nature Regulation Sustainable development Rural areas Rules of procedure Countryside Agency Commission for Rural Communities Natural England
Legislation
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk