Proceeding contribution from Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].

Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

Clearly the noble Lord has access to enormous legal expertise. I am surprised that the way in which subsection 2)(b) is drafted provides the protection that the amendment seeks to give. However, it is best not to engage in heavy legal argument. We will take further advice in light of the noble Lord’s comments. If we are satisfied, we will leave it alone; if we are not, we will come back to it later. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 73 agreed to. Clause 74 [Appeal from adjudicator’s decision]:

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 678 c121GC
Session: 2005-06
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects: Disclosure of information Appeals Company law Companies Directors Applications Assets Age Certification Eligibility Documents Membership Public companies Private companies Offices Registration Voting rights Stocks and shares Shareholders Trade marks
Legislation: Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

Secondary information

Librarians' tools