Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Wednesday, 1 February 2006, in the House of Lords.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Company Law Reform Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage second day. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses room). Clauses 73-153 agreed to, clauses 87,88,90,93-96,101,102,107,108,120,125,147 and 148 as amended.
Secondary information
- Type
- Parliamentary proceeding
- Reference
- 678 c119-76GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Department
- Department of Trade and Industry
- Committee of the Whole House (HL)
- Legislative stage
- Committee stage
- Procedure
- New clauses
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Related items
- Proceeding contributions
-
Lord Razzall | 678 c119-20GC (Link to this contribution) I support my noble friend Lord Sharman. This is not a theoretical problem. At present there are a nu...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c138GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendments Nos. 101 to 102:"Page 42, line 23, leave out paragraph (c) and insert—" ““(c) t...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c138GC (Link to this contribution) I am advised that that amendment was grouped with an amendment that we dealt with on Monday.
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c125-6GC (Link to this contribution) I shall speak to the amendment and the clause-stand-part debate. The current rules on trading disclo...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c143GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 110:"Page 48, line 42, leave out subsection (6)." The noble Lord said: This pro...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c141GC (Link to this contribution) I surrender absolutely after that. I am surprised that the Minister did not pray in aid the earlier ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c141GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 106:"Page 45, line 20, after ““of”” insert ““or the Master of the Court of Prote...
-
Lord Sharman | 678 c151-2GC (Link to this contribution) I shall speak to Amendment No. 120, which is grouped with Amendment No. 119. The amendment is identi...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c176GC (Link to this contribution) This may be a convenient moment for the Committee to adjourn until Monday at 3.30 pm.
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c174-5GC (Link to this contribution) Clause 152 provides an important protection against a director being removed without an opportunity ...
-
Lord Freeman | 678 c170GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 141:"Page 65, leave out line 11." The noble Lord said: I agree that shadow dire...
-
Baroness Murphy | 678 c166GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for that explanation. I certainly understand that Clause 137 needs to be phrase...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c120GC (Link to this contribution) As has been described, Amendment No. 73A seeks to give company names adjudicators additional powers....
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c119GC (Link to this contribution) For reasons that are not clear, Amendment No. 74, which is in my name, contains the last part of thi...
-
Lord Sharman | 678 c119GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 73A:"Page 30, line 39, leave out subsection (1) and insert—" ““(1) If an app...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c138GC (Link to this contribution) Would the noble Lord mind repeating that?
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c138GC (Link to this contribution) That is true, but on reading it I wonder why we would have agreed to Amendment No. 102.
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c136-7GC (Link to this contribution) I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 92 agreed to. Claus...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c136GC (Link to this contribution) The purpose of Clause 92 is to ensure that when a private company re-registers as a public company, ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c135-6GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 97:"Page 39, line 25, leave out paragraph (c)." The noble Lord said: The questi...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c124GC (Link to this contribution) I am advised that Section 28(5) makes liable a company that fails to comply and any officer who is i...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c124GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for that further clarification and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c120-1GC (Link to this contribution) The concern here seems to be that ““goodwill”” needs to be defined for the purposes of this clause, ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c121GC (Link to this contribution) Clearly the noble Lord has access to enormous legal expertise. I am surprised that the way in which ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c121GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 76:"Page 31, line 31, leave out subsection (3)." The noble Lord said: Amendment...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c122-3GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 77:"Page 32, line 11, leave out ““five”” and insert ““three””" The noble Lord s...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c133-4GC (Link to this contribution) The proposed amendments relate to a clause that sets out the requirements relating to the share capi...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c133GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 92:"Page 37, line 40, leave out ““is limited by shares”” and insert ““has a shar...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c129-30GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 86:"Page 36, line 29, leave out ““s”” and insert ““as””" On Question, amendment...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c130GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendments Nos. 87 to 88:"Page 37, line 1, leave out second ““is”” and insert ““its””""Page 37...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c129GC (Link to this contribution) We accept Amendments Nos. 84, 86, 87 and 88 and thank the noble Lord for bringing those matters to o...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c128-9GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Lord for that very comprehensive reply. It is no more satisfactory than it was two...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c129GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 84:"Page 36, line 12, leave out first ““The”” and insert ““A””" The noble Lord ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c144GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for that. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave,...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c143-4GC (Link to this contribution) The clause concerns the requirements for documents to be provided on re-registration of a public com...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c142GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 107:"Page 45, line 24, at end insert—" ““( ) In subsection (4)(a), ““a tru...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c142-3GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 108:"Page 47, line 35, leave out from ““with”” to end of line 36." On Question,...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c140GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for his generous offer. I would have thought that where a director has...
-
Lord Sharman | 678 c160-1GC (Link to this contribution) moved, as an amendment to Amendment No. 130, Amendment No. 131:"Line 2, leave out from beginning to ...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c157GC (Link to this contribution) I think that that probably makes three of us who are baffled. We will have another look at the provi...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c156-7GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister. Perhaps if would be possible to look at the title of the clause for a...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c164GC (Link to this contribution) I beg leave to withdraw my Amendment No. 130. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 132...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c154GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 126:"Page 55, line 36, at end insert ““(and, in Scotland, to any rule that the o...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c153-4GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord is quite right; this clause is needed to implement the Twelfth Company Law Directive ...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c154-5GC (Link to this contribution) This explanation will be a short journey into company legal history. The clauses in this chapter res...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c153GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 122:"Page 54, line 8, leave out ““private”” and insert ““limited””" The noble L...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c155-6GC (Link to this contribution) This is a probing amendment. We are not seeking to remove the whole of the clause from the Bill as m...
-
Baroness Murphy | 678 c150-1GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for that reply. I am reassured in part about the interpretation by the courts. ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c152-3GC (Link to this contribution) I thought the Minister said ““143””. I think the noble Lord, Lord Sharman, may come back to this iss...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c152GC (Link to this contribution) The first two subsections of new Clause 117 contained in Amendments Nos. 119 and 120 are identical. ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c146GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 114:"Page 50, line 34, leave out subsection (4)." The noble Lord said: This is ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c146GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister. Clearly we should have Divisions more often, as he has come back in a...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c146-7GC (Link to this contribution) The amendment would delete subsection (4) from Clause 113 and thus remove the obligation on the comp...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c148GC (Link to this contribution) I am extraordinarily grateful to the Minister. I am greatly illuminated by his remarks, and I beg le...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c147-8GC (Link to this contribution) I would be delighted to do so, although I am not certain that it would carry this debate forward to ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c148GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 115:"Page 51, line 40, leave out ““50”” and insert ““100””" The noble Lord said...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c173GC (Link to this contribution) This clause replaces Section 288(2) of the 1985 Act so far as it applies to directors. It retains th...
-
Lord Freeman | 678 c172-3GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 145:"Page 66, line 42, at end insert—" ““(a) the company, and (b) ”” The ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c172GC (Link to this contribution) We will not astonish the noble Lord. We accept his amendment. On Question, amendment agreed to. Cl...
-
Lord Freeman | 678 c171GC (Link to this contribution) I am entirely content with that explanation. It is very clear and it is on the record. I beg leave t...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c171-2GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 142:"Page 65, line 42, leave out ““18”” and insert ““16””" The noble Lord said:...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c172GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 143:"Page 66, line 1, leave out from ““unless”” to second ““in”” in line 2 and i...
-
Lord Brabazon of Tara | 678 c164GC (Link to this contribution) Before the noble Baroness launches herself into what will no doubt be a very interesting speech, the...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c166GC (Link to this contribution) We have hacked the matter pretty much to death but, in l’esprit d’escalier, I have one further quest...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c166GC (Link to this contribution) There is a standard approach and answer to these questions. We will of course monitor very closely t...
-
Lord Freeman | 678 c166-7GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 137:"Page 63, line 10, leave out ““16”” and insert ““18””" The noble Lord said:...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c138GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 100:"Page 42, line 3, after ““be”” insert ““(or continue to be)””" On Question,...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c139-40GC (Link to this contribution) Where a company changes its status from a public to a private limited company there can be important...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c137GC (Link to this contribution) I understand the point that the Minister is making, but I do not understand why the Government are m...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c136GC (Link to this contribution) I am happy to discuss the record of this discussion. If there is anything further that we need to do...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c137GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 99:"Page 41, line 29, leave out from beginning to third ““a””" The noble Lord s...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c135GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for his reply. Much of that technical stuff came at me quite fast. I w...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c134GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 95:"Page 39, line 7, at end insert ““and””" The noble Lord said: In moving Amen...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c126GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for his response and his reassurance that we are simplifying procedure...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c120GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 75:"Page 31, line 24, at end insert—" ““( ) In this section ““goodwill”” i...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c123GC (Link to this contribution) Clause 75 supplements the clauses earlier in this part on registration of names containing sensitive...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c134GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister. Clearly, nowadays paid-up share capital is not of great concern to ma...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c132GC (Link to this contribution) That is a slightly disappointing reply, but I thank the Minister for it. His speaking note shows tha...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c130GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 90:"Page 37, line 28, at end insert—" ““( ) from a company limited by guar...
-
Lord Sharman | 678 c130-1GC (Link to this contribution) My name is also on the amendment. I echo strongly the arguments made by the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c129GC (Link to this contribution) The amendment would severely disadvantage those wishing to serve documents on any company, whether o...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c129GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister. Yes, the two things should probably be parallel, so we shall think ab...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c129GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 85:"Page 36, line 15, leave out ““14”” and insert ““five working””" The noble L...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c127-8GC (Link to this contribution) Before I speak to the amendments, it might be helpful if I explained the tortuous background to this...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c144-5GC (Link to this contribution) I am disappointed by the Minister’s reply because we are not seeking to extend the Bill. All we are ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c145GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 113:"Page 50, line 15, at end insert—" ““( ) In the case of a company limi...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c144GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 111:"Page 49, line 18, after ““103(2)(b) (”” insert ““private limited””" The no...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c144GC (Link to this contribution) I now understand better the thrust of the point that the noble Lord is making. I acknowledge that my...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c144GC (Link to this contribution) The Minister has not addressed our purpose in tabling the amendment. We are asking why we have this ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c142GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for his reassurance that somebody who lacks mental capacity would not ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c140-1GC (Link to this contribution) The amendment would remove subsection (2), which prevents companies changing their status successive...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c140GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 105:"Page 45, line 11, leave out subsection (2)." The noble Lord said: We are m...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c163-4GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for that response, which is clearly very considered, and for his assur...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c161-3GC (Link to this contribution) I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, that this is a very important part of the Bill. Clause 13...
-
Baroness Murphy | 678 c161GC (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment moved by the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, and have nothing further to add to hi...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c157-60GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 130:"Page 60, line 23, leave out subsection (1) and insert—" (1) All compani...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c153GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendments Nos. 123 to 125:"Page 54, line 12, leave out ““private”” and insert ““limited””""Pa...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c156GC (Link to this contribution) This clause retains an existing exemption to the general prohibition, retained in Clause 127, on a c...
-
Baroness Murphy | 678 c148-9GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 116:"Page 52, line 26, leave out ““not”” and insert ““being””" The noble Barone...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c151GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 119:"After Clause 117, insert the following new clause—" ““ENTRIES RELATING TO...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c152GC (Link to this contribution) It is Clause 743. I am surprised the noble Lord missed it.
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c152GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister. I accept that there is a need to regularise and that we need to keep ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c147GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister. This is a probing amendment to try to discern the gravity of what we ...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c148GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment No. 115 would remove the requirement for an index of members for companies with between 50...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c148GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister and am happy to beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, with...
-
Lord Brabazon of Tara | 678 c176GC (Link to this contribution) The Committee stands adjourned until Monday at 3.30 pm. The Committee adjourned at twenty-three min...
-
Lord Freeman | 678 c173-4GC (Link to this contribution) I find that argument persuasive. It remains to be seen whether, when the Law Society, in particular,...
-
Lord Freeman | 678 c169GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 140:"Page 64, line 33, at end insert—" ““( ) A director owes the duties pr...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c169GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 139:"Page 64, line 32, leave out from ““notwithstanding”” to end of line 33 and ...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c169GC (Link to this contribution) I entirely agree with the noble Lords, Lord Freeman and Lord Hodgson, that anyone who purports to be...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c170-1GC (Link to this contribution) Clauses 146 to 150 retain the requirements of Sections 288 and 289 of the 1985 Act as regards compan...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c138GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps we can look at the Official Report and revert to the matter, but I do not believe that the a...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c138-9GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 103:"Page 43, line 3, at end insert ““, or" (iii) the company delivers to th...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c138GC (Link to this contribution) Of course. Amendment No. 102 will remove the last line and a half of Clause 96, which says,"““and . ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c136GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister. The purpose of the amendment was, not to argue that Clause 92(1)(c) could not ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c137GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 98:"Page 41, line 10, leave out from ““corporate”” to end of line 12." On Quest...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c134-5GC (Link to this contribution) The amendments remove subsection (5)(b) of Clause 91. The subsection provides that the registrar mus...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c124GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 79:"Page 33, line 28, leave out subsections (2) and (3)." The noble Lord said: ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c124-5GC (Link to this contribution) I understand why noble Lords might consider that these two subsections add unnecessary complexity to...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c125GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for that reply. We will reflect on the conditionality argument that he...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c125GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 80:"Page 34, line 31, leave out paragraph (a)." The noble Lord said: In moving ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c126-7GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 81:"Page 36, line 9, after ““office”” insert ““in the United Kingdom””" The nob...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c123-4GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for that. I am not sure that I quite understood why we have changed th...
-
Lord Sharman | 678 c120GC (Link to this contribution) My name is attached to the amendment as well. I will not delay the Committee’s proceedings except to...
-
Lord Sharman | 678 c120GC (Link to this contribution) I have heard what the noble Lord has said. I just observe that the problem with trademark legislatio...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c121-2GC (Link to this contribution) The thinking behind the amendment is that a company should change its name as soon as an adjudicator...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c122GC (Link to this contribution) The last concern could be tackled by a further addition to our amendment: that during the appeal pro...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c133GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 93:"Page 38, line 17, leave out ““the authorised minimum”” and insert ““£100,000...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c131-2GC (Link to this contribution) It may be useful to set out the background to Amendment No. 90. If a company of type A wishes to bec...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c132GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 91:"Page 37, line 31, after first ““company”” insert ““(whether limited or unlim...
-
Baroness Fookes | 678 c131GC (Link to this contribution) I must suspend the Committee as there is a Division in the House. I propose that we return in 10 min...
-
Lord Sharman | 678 c127GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment No. 83, which is grouped with Amendment No. 81, is in my name. The noble Lord, Lord Hodgso...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c144GC (Link to this contribution) It is important that the Bill is as helpful as possible to the reader. That has been the drafting ap...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c143GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 109:"Page 48, line 19, at end insert—" ““( ) In subsection (4)(a), ““a tru...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c141-2GC (Link to this contribution) This clause requires members of a company to give their assent before a company re-registers as unli...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 678 c140GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 104:"Page 44, line 39, leave out from ““with”” to end of line 40." On Question,...
-
Lord Sharman | 678 c164GC (Link to this contribution) I do not think that the Minister is right in his argument about cost. Significant savings would aris...
-
Baroness Murphy | 678 c164GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 135:"Page 61, line 8, leave out ““documents and information”” and insert ““all t...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c154GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 127:"Page 56, line 21, leave out paragraph (a)." The noble Lord said: This is a...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c153GC (Link to this contribution) I shall be very brief because I think the Minister has answered the issue we wished to raise in rela...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c155GC (Link to this contribution) As I explained, this was a probing amendment to get the Minister’s up-to-date thinking on this issue...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 678 c149-50GC (Link to this contribution) My name is on these three amendments and I support the noble Baroness. Our view is that it would be ...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c150GC (Link to this contribution) If the noble Baroness agrees, I should like to take together her proposed amendments to this clause....
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c145-6GC (Link to this contribution) Clause 112 defines who the members of a company are. The subscribers—that is, those who authenticate...
-
Lord Freeman | 678 c175-6GC (Link to this contribution) That is a logical and understandable argument. However, I am not entirely satisfied. One of the main...
-
Lord Freeman | 678 c174GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 148:"Page 68, line 7, at end insert ““or require that the meeting be adjourned t...
-
Lord Freeman | 678 c169-70GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for that explanation and beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by le...
-
Lord Freeman | 678 c172GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 144:"Page 66, line 7, after ““is”” insert ““a””" The noble Lord said: This coul...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c169GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 138:"Page 64, line 32, after ““a”” insert ““person acting as a””" The noble Lor...
-
Baroness Murphy | 678 c164-5GC (Link to this contribution) If there were full shareholder enfranchisement, this clause, which empowers the Secretary of State, ...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c165-6GC (Link to this contribution) Clause 137 confers on the Secretary of State a power to make regulations to compel companies to prov...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 678 c167-8GC (Link to this contribution) It is a fact not known to many people that, as the noble Lord, Lord Freeman, said, companies’ legisl...
-
Lord Freeman | 678 c168-9GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for that explanation. I have not received any representations from any...
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Appeals Company law Companies Directors Applications Assets Age Certification Eligibility Documents Membership Public companies Private companies Offices Registration Voting rights Stocks and shares Shareholders Trade marks
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Show all contributions (153)
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-02-08 19:19:35 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_54657
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_54657
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_54657