Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 2 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill.

London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill

I am grateful to the Minister. It is not just disruption which is on the minds of the boroughs. They want to be clear about when the powers will start to be used because they would have to notify the ODA about the use of their highways, street and traffic powers; they would have to seek the ODA’s approval for their own traffic regulation orders. That could be for many years before the start of the games. I am much clearer now about what is in the mind of the inchoate, interim ODA and the Government. The boroughs should talk to the Government direct about this, but they have been concerned. If any further clarification is needed, I hope that it can be given to a reasonable extent. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 55 not moved.] On Question, Whether Clause 11 shall stand part of the Bill?

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c215GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Codes of practice Betting Broadcasting Advertising Construction Fraud Industrial relations Land Freedom of information Greater London Gambling Infrastructure Inland waterways Freight Facilities Powers Planning Olympic Games Newspaper press Railways Mobile phones Railway network Mayor of London Marketing Lighting Paralympic Games Security Transport Safety Road traffic Roads Sports Technology Transport for London Street cleaning Docklands Light Railway London Development Agency London 2012 Organising Committee Olympic Delivery Authority
Legislation
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk