Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Glentoran (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 2 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill.

London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill

I support the noble Baroness’s amendment, not necessarily in detail, but certainly in concept. The Committee will agree that at least a large portion of the selling of the 2012 Olympics was the legacy. However—this is where I part company slightly from the noble Baroness—the legacy must not be only in London; it must be nationwide and include sport as well as infrastructure. It would be helpful if we had a skeleton plan, even if it is in the form of regulations, that lays down some objectives for the ODA—and LOCOG where it comes into it—about what the nation expects as a legacy.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c218GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Codes of practice Betting Broadcasting Advertising Construction Fraud Industrial relations Land Freedom of information Greater London Gambling Infrastructure Inland waterways Freight Facilities Powers Planning Olympic Games Newspaper press Railways Mobile phones Railway network Mayor of London Marketing Lighting Paralympic Games Security Transport Safety Road traffic Roads Sports Technology Transport for London Street cleaning Docklands Light Railway London Development Agency London 2012 Organising Committee Olympic Delivery Authority
Legislation
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk