Proceeding contribution from Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
On Amendment No. 170, the inclusion of the words,"““take all reasonable steps to””," would invite litigation. The interpretation of what the director had or had not done would be called into question. The recipe that has been recommended is not wise. On Amendment No. 169, I do not believe that the noble Lord, Lord Freeman, has made a substantial case. The words of the Bill catch the precise evil that we want to avoid. Having regard to what has been urged would result in the worst of all words. We must avoid litigation on this subject as well. Therefore, I commend what the Government have said.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 678 c286GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Codes of practice Company law Companies Directors Civil proceedings Conduct Finance Liability Management Taxation Shareholders Transfer pricing
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:26:03 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297929
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297929
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297929