Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. 170A:"Page 70, line 3, leave out ““or possibly may conflict””" The noble Lord said: This amendment deals with the issue of things one does not know about when accepting a directorship. I take cognisance of what the Minister said in answer to the last amendment. He has been very helpful and I can now see a way in which we will be able to resolve that issue. I can see that many resolutions will be put before boards of directors once the Bill becomes law to authorise all the other directorships. If that is the way, we will deal with it. This amendment deals with the crystal ball issue. It removes the words ““or possibly may conflict”” in Clause 159(1). It is difficult to see how one can deal with an issue that is not related to another directorship. When one goes on to a board with another directorship, one can ask for authorisation. Other things may arise in future that give rise to a conflict that one cannot foresee at that point in time. Taking the steps to avoid that concerns me. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c290GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Codes of practice Company law Companies Directors Civil proceedings Conduct Finance Liability Management Taxation Shareholders Transfer pricing
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk