Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Freeman (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill (HL).


Company Law Reform Bill

I am grateful for that explanation. This side of the Committee is clear that we want an efficient capital market to operate. That requires openness and minimal obligations, without anything that cannot be justified as being necessary to protect shareholders and to ensure that business is conducted transparently and efficiently. The Attorney-General has probably steered a careful course between openness and imposing obligations. I note what he says about Clause 389(4)—that it provides for subsequent regulation. Those who have made representations to this side will wish to read the record and perhaps reach a considered judgment in due course. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c326-7GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Contracts Data protection Company law Companies Directors Conduct Annual reports Conflict of interests Liability Exemptions Electronic commerce Payments Public companies Money lenders Meetings Shares Shareholders
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk