Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Goldsmith (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill (HL).


Company Law Reform Bill

So far as current law is concerned, as my noble friend will recall, we are seeking to replace the general duties in the current law with a statement of what in many instances is a codification of the current law and in others makes some change to it. The purpose of subsection (4) is to make it clear, as it says, that the duty not to accept benefits from third parties will not be infringed if the benefit cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict of interest. I paraphrase; it is the statute that matters, not my words. I was about to conclude my sentence by saying that I will write to the noble Lord and to other noble Lords who have participated in Committee today and put a copy of the letter in the Library, rather than giving an answer straight off.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c331GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Related items
Deposited Paper HDEP 2006/139
Monday, 27 February 2006
Deposited papers
House of Lords
Subjects
Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Contracts Data protection Company law Companies Directors Conduct Annual reports Conflict of interests Liability Exemptions Electronic commerce Payments Public companies Money lenders Meetings Shares Shareholders
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk