Proceeding contribution from Lord Freeman (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill (HL).
Company Law Reform Bill
I found that explanation satisfactory. It was a probing amendment and it has been clarified. I do not intend to return to it. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 179 to 181 not moved.] Clause 162 agreed to. Clause 163 agreed to. Clause 164 [Consent, approval or authorisation by members]: On Question, Whether Clause 164 shall stand part of the Bill?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 678 c336GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Contracts Data protection Company law Companies Directors Conduct Annual reports Conflict of interests Liability Exemptions Electronic commerce Payments Public companies Money lenders Meetings Shares Shareholders
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:08:52 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299564
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299564
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299564