Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill (HL).
Company Law Reform Bill
Clause 206 replaces Section 318 of the Companies Act 1985. Under that section, companies are already required to keep a written memorandum setting out the terms of any director’s contract of service with the company or with a subsidiary of the company, if that contract is not in writing. The written memorandum must be open to inspection by members. This seems to be an obvious anti-avoidance provision. Without it, the disclosure requirements imposed by this clause could be avoided simply by the director having an unwritten service contract. Section 318 of the Companies Act 1985 was considered by the Law Commissioners, and they did not note any difficulty with this particular requirement. A memorandum is nothing more than a proper written record of the terms of the contract or agreement.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 678 c362-3GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Contracts Data protection Company law Companies Directors Conduct Annual reports Conflict of interests Liability Exemptions Electronic commerce Payments Public companies Money lenders Meetings Shares Shareholders
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:11:00 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299643
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299643
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_299643