Proceeding contribution from David Heath (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 9 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill.
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill
I am not sure that the Law Commission is the right vehicle. I have enormous respect for it, but this is not a role for which it would be best suited. However, audit bodies of various kinds could provide an extremely useful function. I would very much like to see such retrospective evaluation. Having been involved in countless Home Office Bills over recent years, I am conscious of the fact that we have often had to amend Bills before they have even come into effect—even the criminal justice Bill of whatever year that was going to be the end of crime as we know it. We need to get a grip on the cumulative effect of legislation, and the House needs to have the right advice to be able to do its job of post-legislative scrutiny much more effectively than it does now.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 442 c1070-1
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Codes of practice Administration Business Bureaucracy Constitutions Delegated legislation Common law Legislative process EU law Government departments Legislation Law Commission Ministerial powers Public opinion Parliamentary scrutiny Regulation Legislative reform orders Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:56:13 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_300029
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_300029
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_300029