Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. 300HA:"Page 129, line 17, at end insert ““to do so””" The noble Lord said: I propose to speak to this grouping of four minor drafting amendments. At present it is not clear whether Clause 290 permits a number of different requests to be made by members where they require a company to circulate a statement. The amendment clarifies that all requests must be to the same effect. Similar amendments cover the equivalent point for Clause 512 in Part 16, which entitles members to require a company to publish an auditor’s statement on the website, and Clause 594 in Part 21, which entitles members to require a company to give notice requiring a person to disclose their interest in the company’s shares. I note that Members of the Committee have tabled Amendment No. 349C to address the same point in Clause 594. I therefore hope that the Opposition will withdraw their amendment and I commend the government amendments. I beg to move. On Question, amendment agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c123GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Absent voting Liability Donors Expenditure Members Political parties Public companies Public records Meetings Voting methods Shareholders Rules of procedure
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk