Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Wednesday, 1 March 2006, in the House of Lords.
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Company Law Reform Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage sixth day. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Room 3A/4B). Clauses 288-399 agreed to, clauses 290,291,295,296,298,313,314,324,330,339,358,365,366,373 and 374 as amended.
Secondary information
- Type
- Parliamentary proceeding
- Reference
- 679 c121-88GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Department
- Department of Trade and Industry
- Legislative stage
- Committee stage
- Procedure
- New clauses
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Related items
- Proceeding contributions
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c174GC (Link to this contribution) My name and that of my noble friend Lord Razzall are attached to these two amendments. I will not, b...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c149-50GC (Link to this contribution) I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 339, as amended, agr...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c150GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301ZD:"Page 151, line 9, at end insert—" ““( ) A resolution conferring aut...
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c135-6GC (Link to this contribution) I have listened very carefully to all sides of this debate. I endorse entirely what the noble Lord, ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c135GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps the Minister could address—not necessarily this afternoon, but with his officials when he co...
-
Viscount Allenby of Megiddo | 679 c136GC (Link to this contribution) The Question is that Clause 328 stand part of the Bill. As many as are of that opinion will say, ““C...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c133GC (Link to this contribution) The policy was further endorsed by Paul Myners in his Review of the impediments to voting UK shares....
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c133GC (Link to this contribution) Our names are added to Clause 322 stand part, in which case there is a complete anomaly. That clause...
-
Lord Clinton-Davis | 679 c180GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to my noble friend. Does he agree that what happens in the top echelons of a company r...
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c183-4GC (Link to this contribution) I too believe that transparency is absolutely essential in these matters. While listening to the deb...
-
Lord Clinton-Davis | 679 c187GC (Link to this contribution) I would like to know the present position, before Deloitte & Touche make its report.
-
Lord Clinton-Davis | 679 c187GC (Link to this contribution) I fear that I may have misrepresented the position I take. I want to know the present position befor...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c188GC (Link to this contribution) This may be a convenient time for the Committee to adjourn until Tuesday 7 March at 3.30 pm in the M...
-
Viscount Allenby of Megiddo | 679 c121GC (Link to this contribution) I have been asked to remind the Committee that, if there is a Division in the Chamber while we are s...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c122GC (Link to this contribution) The answer to that question is very simple. This is referring not to any previous Companies Act, but...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c122-3GC (Link to this contribution) I accept what the Minister said; in fact, he gave a far more thorough response to my inquiry than I ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c125GC (Link to this contribution) I just wanted to make sure that the negative was included to avoid future confusion. I think that th...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c123-4GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300L:"After Clause 291, insert the following new clause—" ““EXPENSES OF CIRCUL...
-
Lord Lea of Crondall | 679 c178-80GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 308:"Page 181, line 13, at end insert—" ““( ) Where the company is not a s...
-
Lord Lea of Crondall | 679 c165GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for that explanation. This is obviously an issue which goes quite wide. I suppo...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c161-2GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301H:"Page 169, line 3, leave out ““allowed for delivering its individual accoun...
-
Lord Lea of Crondall | 679 c162-3GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 302:"Page 172, line 34, at end insert ““always providing that such undertakings ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c161GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301FA:"Page 164, line 25, leave out ““of the company”” and insert—" ““(a) in...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c160-1GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301F:"Page 164, line 8, leave out from second ““period”” to ““has”” in line 9 an...
-
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 679 c167GC (Link to this contribution) I am pleased to add my name to the amendment so ably moved by my noble kinsman Lady Thornton. I simp...
-
Baroness Thornton | 679 c172GC (Link to this contribution) I thank my noble friend for his detailed and thoughtful response. Perhaps I may quickly refer to the...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c169GC (Link to this contribution) It is very interesting that the noble Lord should say that. He needs to address his comments to the ...
-
Lord Whitty | 679 c167-8GC (Link to this contribution) My name is also attached to this group of amendments. Previous speakers have covered most of the poi...
-
Baroness Noakes | 679 c172-4GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 307A:"Page 178, line 34, at end insert—" ““(9) The directors responsible for...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c151GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for that positive response. Concern has been expressed because Clause ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c155GC (Link to this contribution) I certainly agree with the Minister’s first statement—that we will not have a meeting of the minds o...
-
Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market | 679 c155GC (Link to this contribution) I can envisage a situation in which some of the directors of a subsidiary company are, let us say fo...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c156GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301DZB:"Page 155, line 22, after ““donation”” insert ““or political expenditure”...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c156GC (Link to this contribution) We do not see these as just drafting amendments. The Government are not persuaded by them. We believ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c157GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301DA:"Page 159, line 17, leave out ““that year”” and insert ““the accounting re...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c142-4GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301ZZB:"Page 149, line 17, leave out subsection (2)." The noble Lord said: The ...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c141GC (Link to this contribution) So far as my amendment is concerned, we thought that this was simply a question of drafting, and I a...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c145-6GC (Link to this contribution) Yes, that is a very helpful answer—especially the Minister’s first point that the Electoral Commissi...
-
Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market | 679 c144GC (Link to this contribution) I did not want to interrupt the noble Lord—but, for the avoidance of doubt, yes, I was on the Commit...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c144-5GC (Link to this contribution) As I have explained, the regime for the control of political donations and expenditure by companies ...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c148-9GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301ZC:"Page 151, line 2, at end insert—" ““( ) If in proceedings brought b...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c150GC (Link to this contribution) I wish to speak to the amendments standing in my name and that of my noble friend. The noble Lord, L...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c136GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300V:"Page 144, line 26, at end insert ““(in Scotland, an interdict or an order ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c136GC (Link to this contribution) I am afraid that I am going to produce a mouse rather than a mountain. Clause 328 is on the power of...
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c133-4GC (Link to this contribution) Could I seek further clarification on that? If I remember rightly—I do not have the papers in front ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c138GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdraw...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c138-9GC (Link to this contribution) We have tabled two amendments in this group, Amendments Nos. 301ZZE and 301ZZF. They address the sec...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c140-1GC (Link to this contribution) I would like to speak before the noble Lord, Lord Razzall, decides what to do with his amendment. I ...
-
Baroness Noakes | 679 c133GC (Link to this contribution) Could the noble Lord give examples that have arisen in this connection? I do not think that I can re...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c133GC (Link to this contribution) I shall deal with that last point first: it gives him the right to attend if he has been appointed b...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c131GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300U:"After Clause 314, insert the following new clause—" ““PUBLIC COMPANIES: ...
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c130-1GC (Link to this contribution) In that case, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
-
Lord Clinton-Davis | 679 c181GC (Link to this contribution) I should like to support what my noble friend has said. If the man or woman in the street is to unde...
-
Lord Whitty | 679 c181-2GC (Link to this contribution) I should like to register my support for my noble friend’s amendments and in doing so raise a broade...
-
Lord Lea of Crondall | 679 c180-1GC (Link to this contribution) I am glad to agree with my noble friend. That is exactly what I want to do, and my noble friends in ...
-
Lord Lea of Crondall | 679 c186GC (Link to this contribution) I have to say that I am not very impressed with my noble friend’s Treasury brief. Does he have nothi...
-
Lord Lea of Crondall | 679 c188GC (Link to this contribution) I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 396 agreed to. Clau...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c123GC (Link to this contribution) Let us have a look at this. We will see whether there is confusion on that and pick it up later on. ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c127GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300QB:"Page 137, line 41, at end insert—" ““( ) A private company is not r...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c125-6GC (Link to this contribution) Clause 296 replaces Section 373 of the 1985 Act. Subsection (1) restricts companies’ ability, throug...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c123GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300I:"Page 129, line 37, leave out subsections (5) and (6)." On Question, amend...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c129-30GC (Link to this contribution) I accept the argument. All these measures have their imperfections, and volatility is clearly one of...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c176-7GC (Link to this contribution) Before the Minister replies to my noble friend, I urge him to listen to her last remarks about the s...
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c177GC (Link to this contribution) My views on the OFR are well known; I am a great supporter of it. It is the one thing that has moved...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c177-8GC (Link to this contribution) : I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Noakes, for initiating this debate on the operating and ...
-
Baroness Thornton | 679 c165-7GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 305A:"Page 178, line 20, leave out ““where appropriate,””" The noble Baroness s...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c161GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301G:"Page 167, line 26, leave out ““allowed for delivering its individual accou...
-
Baroness Noakes | 679 c160GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for that comprehensive response. I shall certainly ask the institute to read Ha...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c158-60GC (Link to this contribution) Clause 359 sets out the general duty to keep accounting records. Such records must be sufficient to ...
-
Lord Lea of Crondall | 679 c170GC (Link to this contribution) I add just one more word. It is not my contention that Clause 156 goes a great distance towards the ...
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c169-70GC (Link to this contribution) I wish to add to what has been said. I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson. I shall reread the r...
-
Lord Lea of Crondall | 679 c169GC (Link to this contribution) I very much doubt whether my noble friend will say that, certainly not in the provocative terms just...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c152-3GC (Link to this contribution) I follow the argument the Minister makes, but I still do not understand why the liability for an una...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c153GC (Link to this contribution) There may be a misunderstanding. We are not suggesting that if the directors of the subsidiary compa...
-
Viscount Ullswater | 679 c152GC (Link to this contribution) I must advise the Committee that if this amendment is agreed to, I shall be unable to call Amendment...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c152GC (Link to this contribution) We believe it is essential that political donations or expenditure by subsidiary companies are autho...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c153GC (Link to this contribution) I will obviously think about what the Minister says. I think that it is a novel proposition. Why sho...
-
Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market | 679 c155GC (Link to this contribution) Or you could cite another party should you wish to do so. But it would be very unfair. In this case,...
-
Lord Lea of Crondall | 679 c155GC (Link to this contribution) Would it be possible to make a provision for different subsidiaries to make donations to different p...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c155-6GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to my noble friend for that very practical example. I will leave the noble Lord, Lord ...
-
Viscount Ullswater | 679 c144GC (Link to this contribution) I must advise the Committee that, if this amendment is agreed to, I shall be unable to call Amendmen...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c147GC (Link to this contribution) It is important that donations and expenditure are authorised by the company’s members, not by the b...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c147-8GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister. I can safely say that it was the response that I was expecting. It is...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c149GC (Link to this contribution) The Bill introduces important changes to the rules on ratification and liability in cases of unautho...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c149GC (Link to this contribution) In moving the amendment I should have referred to my Amendment No. 301DZJ, which deals with ratifica...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c148GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301ZA:"Page 150, line 34, leave out from first ““of”” to end of line 35 and inse...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c150-1GC (Link to this contribution) These amendments highlight an area where the Government have responded to business concerns that the...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c134-5GC (Link to this contribution) We will give further thought to that issue and the extent of it, but I have been assured that there ...
-
Viscount Allenby of Megiddo | 679 c136GC (Link to this contribution) Does the noble Lord wish to speak to it?
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c138GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301:"Page 146, line 40, after ““evidence”” insert ““(in Scotland, sufficient evi...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c138GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301ZZA:"Page 149, line 5, leave out subsection (4)." The noble Lord said: We ha...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c141GC (Link to this contribution) Without being drawn to respond specifically to the noble Lord’s example, I should say that the defin...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c136-7GC (Link to this contribution) The Deputy Chairman obviously does not want to have this clause debated. The provisions of Chapter 5...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c137-8GC (Link to this contribution) Clause 329(1)(a) requires all companies to maintain records comprising copies of resolutions passed ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c137GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300W:"Page 146, line 24, at end insert ““or records made pursuant to section 330...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c132-3GC (Link to this contribution) I have a number of clause stand part debates in this group, and I shall speak to those now. We are r...
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c132GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300UA:"Page 140, line 7, leave out subsection (1)." The noble Lord said: In mov...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c131-2GC (Link to this contribution) Clause 315 requires quoted companies to disclose on a website the results of all polls taken at a ge...
-
Lord Lea of Crondall | 679 c183GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Baroness for giving way. Presumably in her view of company law—and this i...
-
Baroness Noakes | 679 c183GC (Link to this contribution) I sought to confine myself at the moment to Amendment No. 308, which asks for a committee to be set ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c121GC (Link to this contribution) This probing matter has been brought to our attention by people involved in the company law world as...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c126GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300N:"Page 131, line 34, leave out third ““a”” and insert ““any such””" On Ques...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c125GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300MA:"Page 131, line 32, leave out paragraph (b)." The noble Lord said: Clause...
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c126GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300NA:"Page 132, line 2, at end insert—" ““( ) For the purposes of this se...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c126GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lords, Lord Sharman and Lord Razzall, for tabling this amendment, and rai...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c125GC (Link to this contribution) Certainly the wording is as the noble Lord says. Subsection (3) should read:"““This section does not...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c123GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300HA:"Page 129, line 17, at end insert ““to do so””" The noble Lord said: I pr...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c124GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300M:"Page 131, line 26, after ““and”” insert ““the demand””" The noble Lord sa...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c124GC (Link to this contribution) I do not think that the Minister said the right words. He said, ““And the demand is subsequently wit...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c124GC (Link to this contribution) I think the wording is,"““and the demand is not subsequently withdrawn””." Am I right?
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c124GC (Link to this contribution) Certainly the text should read,"““and the demand is not subsequently withdrawn””."
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c130GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300TA:"Page 139, line 13, leave out ““statement”” and insert ““resolution””" Th...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c130GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendments Nos. 300S and 300T:"Page 139, line 8, at end insert—" ““( ) Subsection (1) ha...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c130GC (Link to this contribution) We can deal with this very quickly. Government Amendment No. 300T removes Clause 314(3), which conta...
-
Baroness Noakes | 679 c175GC (Link to this contribution) I had hoped for a little more warmth from the Minister today. I feel a little disappointed that he i...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c174-5GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness, Lady Noakes, has tabled some important amendments relating to safe harbours for ...
-
Baroness Noakes | 679 c175-6GC (Link to this contribution) I have grouped the stand part debates on Clauses 393 to 395, 442 and 484, which deal with the OFR, f...
-
Lord Lea of Crondall | 679 c177GC (Link to this contribution) I am quite sure that if I were to agree with the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, on this question and if h...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c163-5GC (Link to this contribution) Amendments Nos. 302 to 305 all seek to amend Clause 382, ““Information about related undertakings””....
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c170-2GC (Link to this contribution) I am delighted to have this opportunity to speak. I felt that perhaps the Government were not to be ...
-
Lord Lea of Crondall | 679 c168-9GC (Link to this contribution) I am very glad to follow the intervention from the noble Baroness because it illustrates that conseq...
-
Baroness Noakes | 679 c168GC (Link to this contribution) I inquire of those who support the amendments whether they have given any consideration to the costs...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c151-2GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301CB:"Page 152, line 7, leave out paragraph (b)." The noble Lord said: This am...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c154-5GC (Link to this contribution) I suspect that we will not have a meeting of minds on this point today. We accept that it is a gener...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c153-4GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301CC:"Page 152, line 8, at end insert—" ““and who were, in either case, direc...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c156-7GC (Link to this contribution) I had a good try. I shall read what the Minister said. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the...
-
Baroness Noakes | 679 c157-8GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301E:"Page 159, line 39, leave out paragraphs (a) to (c) and insert ““to ensure ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c141GC (Link to this contribution) I understand absolutely what the Minister is saying and I accept that technically he is quite right....
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c146-7GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 301ZZG:"Page 150, line 25, at end insert—" ““( ) alternatively, in either ...
-
Lord Razzall | 679 c148GC (Link to this contribution) had given notice of his intention to move Amendment No. 301ZB:"Page 150, line 34, after first ““of””...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c149GC (Link to this contribution) We think it unnecessary to make a specific reference but shall give some consideration to the matter...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c136GC (Link to this contribution) Are we on Clause 328 stand part?
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c139-40GC (Link to this contribution) It may be helpful if I begin by reminding the Committee of the provenance of this part of the Bill. ...
-
Viscount Allenby of Megiddo | 679 c131GC (Link to this contribution) That amendment should have been pre-empted. We will brush over that one. Clause 314, as amended, ag...
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c131GC (Link to this contribution) The purpose here is to relieve companies of an unnecessary statutory requirement. This clause requir...
-
Baroness Noakes | 679 c182-3GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord is entitled to that view in relation to this Bill. We agree with the noble Lords, Lo...
-
Baroness Noakes | 679 c182GC (Link to this contribution) I want to make a few comments about this. I would say to the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, that this is a...
-
Lord Whitty | 679 c182GC (Link to this contribution) When we consider legislation in this place, we ought to consider its impact in rather wider terms th...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c187GC (Link to this contribution) My noble friend, with respect, may misunderstand. Deloitte & Touche has made its report, the outcome...
-
Lord Clinton-Davis | 679 c184GC (Link to this contribution) Would the noble Lord say that that is typical of all companies, or only typical of the companies on ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c187GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps the best thing that I can do to help my noble friend is ensure that he receives a copy of th...
-
Lord Clinton-Davis | 679 c186-7GC (Link to this contribution) Before the Minister replies to my noble friend Lord Lea’s highly relevant question, I must say that ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c185-6GC (Link to this contribution) I will try to do so in finishing this presentation, but if my noble friend thinks that at the end of...
-
Lord Clinton-Davis | 679 c185GC (Link to this contribution) My noble friend speaks of very high compliance. Will he give further and better particulars?
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c184-5GC (Link to this contribution) I thank all noble Lords who have participated in the debate, which has been interesting, although it...
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c184GC (Link to this contribution) I would not say that it is typical of all companies, because not all companies have remuneration com...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c187GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may explain the situation again. The report is not one that, essentially, will be implemen...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 679 c188GC (Link to this contribution) I want to make it clear on the record that I did not say that the Government do not have a policy on...
-
Lord Lea of Crondall | 679 c187-8GC (Link to this contribution) The Government will rue the day when they say in public that they have no policy on directors year a...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c128GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister, as I am grateful for his understanding of what he thought I said, eve...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c127-8GC (Link to this contribution) I am slightly puzzled because, as I read it, the amendment says something slightly different from wh...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c126GC (Link to this contribution) I am afraid that I am disappointed with the Minister’s response. The example that we gave—again, fro...
-
Lord Sharman | 679 c126-7GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for that explanation. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendmen...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c127GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendments Nos. 300P and 300Q:"Page 132, line 14, leave out ““shareholder”” and insert ““membe...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c123GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendments Nos. 300J and 300K:"Page 130, line 8, after ““to”” insert ““section (Expenses of ci...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c124GC (Link to this contribution) I was reading accurately from my script and I was therefore wrong.
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c129GC (Link to this contribution) This amendment seeks to increase one of the thresholds required for members to propose a resolution ...
-
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 679 c128-9GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300QC:"Page 138, line 27, leave out from ““company”” to end of line 28 and inser...
-
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 679 c130GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 300R:"Page 138, line 37, leave out subsections (5) and (6)." On Question, amend...
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Absent voting Liability Donors Expenditure Members Political parties Public companies Public records Meetings Voting methods Shareholders Rules of procedure
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Show all contributions (160)
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-02-08 19:19:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_55246
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_55246
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_55246