Proceeding contribution from Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
I do not think that the Minister said the right words. He said, ““And the demand is subsequently withdrawn””. He meant, ““is not subsequently withdrawn””. I say that so that the record is right. I am sure that he meant to read out the correct words. I listened carefully to what the Minister said and I do not believe that he included the negative, but I am sure that he meant to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c124GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Absent voting Liability Donors Expenditure Members Political parties Public companies Public records Meetings Voting methods Shareholders Rules of procedure
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:01:06 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304076
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304076
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304076