Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Clause 296 replaces Section 373 of the 1985 Act. Subsection (1) restricts companies’ ability, through their articles, to exclude members’ right to demand a poll. However, like Section 373, it allows the articles to exclude the right to a poll on both the election of the chairman of the meeting and the adjournment of a meeting. The amendment seeks to prevent the articles excluding the right to a poll on the adjournment of the meeting. The effect would be that enough members acting together could require a poll on a vote to adjourn the meeting. This would be a disruptive change for a broad range of companies that have taken advantage of the current provisions. There was no support for such a change in the consultation. I therefore hope the noble Lord will not press his amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c125-6GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Absent voting Liability Donors Expenditure Members Political parties Public companies Public records Meetings Voting methods Shareholders Rules of procedure
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:38:00 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304083
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304083
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304083