Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

Clause 296 replaces Section 373 of the 1985 Act. Subsection (1) restricts companies’ ability, through their articles, to exclude members’ right to demand a poll. However, like Section 373, it allows the articles to exclude the right to a poll on both the election of the chairman of the meeting and the adjournment of a meeting. The amendment seeks to prevent the articles excluding the right to a poll on the adjournment of the meeting. The effect would be that enough members acting together could require a poll on a vote to adjourn the meeting. This would be a disruptive change for a broad range of companies that have taken advantage of the current provisions. There was no support for such a change in the consultation. I therefore hope the noble Lord will not press his amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c125-6GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Absent voting Liability Donors Expenditure Members Political parties Public companies Public records Meetings Voting methods Shareholders Rules of procedure
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk