Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. 301FA:"Page 164, line 25, leave out ““of the company”” and insert—" ““(a)   in the case of the company’s individual accounts, of the company; (b)   in the case of the company’s group accounts, of the group as a whole. In paragraph (b) ““the group”” means the company and its subsidiary undertakings included in the consolidation.”” The noble Lord said: Clause 366 reflects the principle that accounts should give a true and fair view of the company’s financial position. We have been asked whether there could be doubt as to whether the principle applies to a parent company’s individual accounts and its group accounts. We have always made it clear that it applies to both. There is no doubt about the meaning and intention of the clause. However, if there is any danger that anyone might question that, it seems sensible to remove that possibility. This does not otherwise change the purpose or effect of this clause. I beg to move. On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 366, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 367 to 372 agreed to. Clause 373 [Exemption for company included in EEA group accounts of larger group]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c161GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Absent voting Liability Donors Expenditure Members Political parties Public companies Public records Meetings Voting methods Shareholders Rules of procedure
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk