Proceeding contribution from Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].

Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

I thank the Minister for that explanation. This is obviously an issue which goes quite wide. I suppose I am looking for movement towards a multinational company law. I do not expect this amendment to be able to do that in an easy, straightforward way. But there is a debate to be had on these questions, and it will be important to study in Hansard exactly what has been said. We will then give more thought to how we proceed. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 303 to 305 not moved.] Clause 382 agreed to. Clauses 383 to 389 agreed to. Clause 390 [Contents of directors’ report: business review]:

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 679 c165GC
Session: 2005-06
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects: Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Absent voting Liability Donors Expenditure Members Political parties Public companies Public records Meetings Voting methods Shareholders Rules of procedure
Legislation: Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

Secondary information

Librarians' tools