Proceeding contribution from Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 15 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill 2005-06.
Terrorism Bill
The Home Secretary used a strange word just before the previous intervention, when he said that people may be found guilty of glorification. How can the word ““may”” be expressed so that people clearly understand that they could glorify something and they might not be committing an offence? What is the distinction?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 442 c1438
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Civil liberties Incitement International cooperation Judges Internet Ethnic groups History Freedom of expression Police Powers Muslims Terrorism Training Encouragement of terrorism
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-09-24 16:03:44 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304928
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304928
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304928