Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Ruth Kelly (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 15 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Education and Inspections Bill.


Education and Inspections Bill

The hon. Gentleman makes a point that is relevant to any community school that is working with a specialist school partner, but the Bill is not about financial gain and it is nothing to do with money; it is about expertise, skills and commitment, to help to raise standards in our schools. As the hon. Gentleman said that he wants to encourage collaboration, can he tell me why the Conservative party has consistently tried to characterise our policy of introducing trust schools as a return to the failed old Tory policy of grant-maintained schools? Grant-maintained schools were bribed to opt out of local authority control. They were unaccountable to parents or the local community and able to select their pupils. They were schools for the elite, of the elite. Our new trust schools are completely different from Tory grant-maintained schools. Our schools at the heart of their communities and are accountable to parents, with fair funding, fair admissions, collaboration with external partners and with one another to raise standards, while working within a stronger local authority framework.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c1468-9 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Assessments Accountability Admissions Discipline Disadvantaged Community schools Finance Governing bodies Inspections Faith schools Foundation schools Interviews Local government Parents Local education authorities Pupils Standards Schools Special educational needs Secondary education School meals Vocational education Parenting orders Trust schools Parenting contracts
Legislation
Education and Inspections Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk