Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Adam Ingram (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 29 March 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Deepcut Review.


Deepcut Review

Again, my hon. Friend is close to that issue and has been raising it as a member of the Defence Committee. I am grateful to him for initiating that debate this morning. The issue must be ventilated and examined. I cannot dictate the pace of what happens with the Bill, but I guess that it must be addressed on Report, and if not, by the other place. We could then consider it back here again if necessary. It is for both Houses to decide what should be included in the Bill. We will give a very clear indication of what we believe to be right. Without question, what we propose goes a considerable way to address the issue; we have not fully debated it, obviously, but there is an independent presence within it. I will also make a written response on the basis of Mr. Blake’s view, but that will be consistent with our view of the way in which the Bill should develop. Making that point is a substantial part of what we are doing at present. Let that debate now ensue.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
444 c866 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Bullying Death Army Misconduct Public inquiries Training Young people Reviews Suicide Deepcut Barracks Benton, Sean Collinson, James Gray, Geoff James, Cheryl
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk