Proceeding contribution from Adam Ingram (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 29 March 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Deepcut Review.
Deepcut Review
That is but one idea, and I know that the hon. Gentleman has argued for it in the past. I can consider anything in my response, and I will deal with the specifics of what Mr. Blake has said. I do not want to look at a range of other aspects, unless that is consistent with what we seek to do in the Armed Forces Bill. The hon. Gentleman will have an opportunity when that Bill returns on Report to table such amendments as he feels necessary, but I ask him to listen to the arguments that take place in the Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill and consider them in a balanced and non-partisan way to try to find the best answers. There are very good arguments about why those in the chain of command should be respected in all this. They have the ultimate responsibility for the duty of care for those men and women—young and less young—in their care, because they are the ones who have to take them into those dangerous environments into which we send them. So let us not diminish what they do and their responsibility for the people whom they have under their care.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 444 c866-7
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Bullying Death Army Misconduct Public inquiries Training Young people Reviews Suicide Deepcut Barracks Benton, Sean Collinson, James Gray, Geoff James, Cheryl
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 21:56:43 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313310
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313310
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313310