Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. A193A:"Page 341, line 4, leave out ““there was”” and insert ““the registrar had””" The noble Lord said: This is a simple amendment intended to improve the clarity of this clause. It would be far clearer if the clause read, ““The registrar may remove from the register anything that the registrar had power, but not duty, to include””, instead of, ““anything that there was power, but no duty””. As currently drafted, it is uncertain what or whose power is being referred to. It could mean, for example, the power of primary legislation, which would give the registrar power to remove anything he wished. I am sure that that is not what the Government intend. This amendment would make it clear that the powers referred to are those that the registrar, and no other body, holds. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c358GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk