Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].

Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

I have heard what the noble Lord said, but we are not persuaded that the wording would be an improvement. Indeed, it arguably introduces a lack of clarity to the clause by seeming to imply that somebody other than the registrar has power to include things on the register. The risk is not great but, since the amendment does not seem necessary, we are not keen to accept it. It is an issue of drafting, and parliamentary counsel has a different view.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c358GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk