Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

Clause 740 relates to the period before the commencement of Section 154(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. The clause heading does not form part of the Bill and cannot be the subject of an amendment agreed in this Committee. However, the House authorities may wish to consider the point made by the noble Lord. However, the description of the clause in its heading as ““transitory”” is because it is a provision that is expected to apply only during a short period of time, and it is not permanent. The subtle distinction which is made, as I understand it, is that a provision such as Clause 741 is ““transitional”” in the context of a change of legislative regime, where it deals with the way in which the old and new regimes are to apply to a case which would otherwise be partly within the old regime and partly within the new. That is called ““transitional””, whereas the previous case is ““transitory”” in that it only exists until particular legislation comes into effect.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c371GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk