Proceeding contribution from Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
I am grateful to the Minister for putting that on the record. In that case, why is there a specific penalty for Clause 752, ““Right to hard copy version””? I understand why the Government might want to have flexibility. I might or might not agree with them, but I can see the argument behind it. But on Clause 752 an offence is clearly stated, which does not seem to fit with the idea of flexibility. We either go one way or the other.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c374GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-12-17 19:40:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314149
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314149
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314149