Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].

Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

I shall respond to the noble Lord’s concerns by explaining the interplay between paragraphs 9 and 10 of Schedule 6. Paragraph 9 permits a company to supply information by website to a member provided that the member has either agreed to website communication or is deemed to have so agreed. Paragraph 10 then sets out what may constitute the deemed agreement of members. Thus, it is not necessary to refer to those who have specifically agreed to website communications in paragraph 10, because they are already covered by paragraph 9. This amendment is not necessary, and we trust that it will not be pressed.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c379GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk