Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
Without a criminal sanction we think the requirement under Clause 752 to provide information or documents in hard copy to an individual member on request has no teeth. A member would be left with no recourse except to take the company to court for an order. We think that a criminal sanction here is proportionate and consistent with that provided under Clauses 409 and 410, which give a member a similar right to ask for a copy of the annual report and accounts. Therefore, I trust that noble Lords will not press the amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 680 c385GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-12-17 19:40:24 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314183
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314183
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_314183