Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].


Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

We understand the concerns about the requirement for companies to send information that is in electronic form in a manner that is in accordance with normal commercial practice. As we touched on earlier, Amendment No. A208A inserts a new clause after Clause 753 on the requirement for authentication. The new clause provides that if the company has not specified the manner in which it should be sent, where the sender has stated his identity, and the company has no reason to doubt his identity, that is sufficient authentication for documents or information sent in electronic form. The provision operates as a default; that is, the company can specify, including by setting out in its articles, the manner by which information in electronic form must be authenticated. The new default means that there is no need to confer a power on the Secretary of State to make guidance on these matters; it is covered. I hope that noble Lord will withdraw the amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c387GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Applications Administration Court orders ICT Liability Information Documents Internet Electronic commerce Email Qualifications Personal records Public companies Staff Postal services Registration Reform Companies House Professional Oversight Board for Accountancy Statutory instruments
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk